Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: The Pats....

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Odessa, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    Demaryius Thomas
    Posts
    25,135

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WTE View Post
    Was discussing that this morning. Yes she is. Brady was much more relaxed in SB's earlier in his career when he didn't have a wife.

    Now he's too tense and too worried about his own personal legacy. I really think w/ Brady it's becoming more about him and less about the "team."
    Meh I can't blame him for wanting to win another championship before he retires. Brady like another player is competitive he wants to win. I think your criticism fits Belicheck just as well if not better than Brady.


    Thank you Mastershake.

  2. The Following User High Fived TXBRONC For This Post:


  3. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Four Corners
    Adopted Bronco:
    Derek Wolfe
    Posts
    10,188

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WTE View Post
    Was discussing that this morning. Yes she is. Brady was much more relaxed in SB's earlier in his career when he didn't have a wife.

    Now he's too tense and too worried about his own personal legacy. I really think w/ Brady it's becoming more about him and less about the "team."
    I think you nailed it on the head. It's almost like he thinks "what is good for Tom is good for the Pats". I may be reading too much into his body language and not enough in his own words, but it looks like he is bothered about not being regarded as one of the top two QB's like he was for so long in his career. Since he has 3 rings, is more about his legacy now?

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rifle
    Adopted Bronco:
    Wesley Woodyard
    Posts
    14,015

    Default

    I don't think it has anything to do with his wife, or Tom worrying about his legacy or any of that. I think the simple fact of the matter is that the Pats matchup terribly to the Giants. The Giants are built to beat the Pats. If the Pats were a smashmouth running team they would beat the Giants because the Giants are built to do two things; make opposing QBs uncomfortable and win close games late and the Pats are built around TB and passing. The way to beat the Pats is to pressure TB and nobody does that better than the Giants.

    Honestly the Giants are the one team in the league right now that I believe would beat NE about 8 out of ten times.
    This aggression will not stand, man!

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Four Corners
    Adopted Bronco:
    Derek Wolfe
    Posts
    10,188

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chazoe60 View Post
    I don't think it has anything to do with his wife, or Tom worrying about his legacy or any of that. I think the simple fact of the matter is that the Pats matchup terribly to the Giants. The Giants are built to beat the Pats. If the Pats were a smashmouth running team they would beat the Giants because the Giants are built to do two things; make opposing QBs uncomfortable and win close games late and the Pats are built around TB and passing. The way to beat the Pats is to pressure TB and nobody does that better than the Giants.

    Honestly the Giants are the one team in the league right now that I believe would beat NE about 8 out of ten times.
    I think the Saints or Packers would have beaten the Patriots as well. The Patriots might have been the best team in the AFC this year, but there were at least 2 or 3 teams better than them in the NFC.

    With Brady I just see him putting up huge numbers and beating the snot out of teams when it doesn't matter and then looking normal when it does. He had a decent game, but he didn't look unstoppable as he has at times over the last few years. Be that his competition, his focus, or whatever, he just isn't as clutch as he used to be.

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    10,681

    Default

    Pats should have won. They had NY right where they wanted. If Brady had placed that ball three inches lower to Welker it would have been game over. He had plenty of time to do it too.

  7. The Following User High Fived WTE For This Post:


  8. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Odessa, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    Demaryius Thomas
    Posts
    25,135

    Default

    I still think it's as much about Belicheck as it is Brady.


    Thank you Mastershake.

  9. The Following User High Fived TXBRONC For This Post:


  10. #22
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Adopted Bronco:
    Emma mother****ing Watson
    Posts
    38,785

    Default

    I agree with WTE. If Welker catches the wide open pass the Giants dont win. Simply comes down to making the necessary plays in the end and who had the ball last. If Welker catches the pass they are at the Giants 11 or 12 yd line and can eat more clock as NY only had one TO left. At worst NE settles for a fg to make it 20-15 with maybe a minute left at best.

  11. The Following 2 Users High Fived Northman For This Post:


  12. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pamplona
    Posts
    2,428

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WTE View Post
    Pats should have won. They had NY right where they wanted. If Brady had placed that ball three inches lower to Welker it would have been game over. He had plenty of time to do it too.
    Sorry. Not really but kinda. For you. A little. For about 30 seconds. That's all you get!

Go
Shop AFC Champions and Super Bowl gear at the official online Pro Shop of the Denver Broncos!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
status.broncosforums.com - BroncosForums status updates
dedicated servers
Partner with the USA Today Sports Media Group