Thread: Ask Anything (Defensively)

Originally Posted by BaileyTheBest

I actually tend to agree, and I almost never agree with you or RC!

Now, don't go getting any ideas . . .

-----

Originally Posted by topscribe

No, I responded to the intended post, the one in which you accused RC of
trolling because he wanted to know the extent of your expertise. I just think
that is a reasonable inquiry, is all.

Nonetheless, far be it from me to want to suppress your posting. Carry on . . .

-----

No, I accused him of trying to troll me in this post:

http://www.broncosforums.com/forums/...0&postcount=12

Not for asking for any qualifications.

And yes, I just don't think it's anyone's business. I have nothing to gain by making this thread. People can ask or doubt. When I don't know, I'll be happy to say I don't know. I don't personally think this a big deal whatsoever, but to each their own haha

Originally Posted by topscribe

TR, when a QB's passing ability is somewhat in question but the running game is
strong, could some variation(s) of the "46" defense be effective in this case?

-----

In this day and age of football, a defense with a box safety (pinches the gaps for the standard front seven and allows more crashing in gaps instead of read and react) is basically employing a 46 package. In a traditional 46 the CBs are counted as two of the LBs and will press contain on the edge of the box in run support (much like modern cover 2 corners will).

Scheming towards a QB "who's passing ability is somewhat in question but the running game is strong" will move a package of a box safety to the forefront. The pinched gaps from the box safety, along with pressed contain from the CBs on the outside edge is precisely what a 46 was invented and implemented to do.

He will show himself as a fraud if he is one. just bc his defensive philosophy could be different than mine or anyone else's doesn't mean he's wrong. But to answer basic questions and answer correctly is fine why question his resume? Don't ask if you don't think he's legit. Or just ask me lol.

And sorry I just read his answer to defending the spread. Good answer no problem with it. My resume jiffy oil lube expert!!! Lol jk

why is everyone talking about me?

Originally Posted by bronconut

why is everyone talking about me?

-----

Originally Posted by topscribe

-----

well, Iirc, the thread was entitled something like ask anything defensively. I thought that is what i did

Originally Posted by bronconut

well, Iirc, the thread was entitled something like ask anything defensively. I thought that is what i did

Not gonna lie, I lol'd.

Originally Posted by Dreadnought

Agreed. RC started out being pointlessly insulting and abrasive from the git-go. I have no idea why. I wouldn't have answered him either under the circumstances.

Oh yeah..you got it, naught. Asking someone why their opine is anymore credible than mine is SOOOOOOOO, umm, howd you so eloquently put it...."pointlessly insulting and abrasive".

LMAO!

How is this: "I would like to know your football resume.

Tia ", that?



Mobile Post via http://Mobile.BroncosForums.com/forums

Originally Posted by BaileyTheBest

I actually tend to agree, and I almost never agree with you or RC!

...there was this time.......

Mobile Post via http://Mobile.BroncosForums.com/forums

Originally Posted by rcsodak

Oh yeah..you got it, naught. Asking someone why their opine is anymore credible than mine is SOOOOOOOO, umm, howd you so eloquently put it...."pointlessly insulting and abrasive".

LMAO!

How is this: "I would like to know your football resume.

Tia ", that?



Mobile Post via http://Mobile.BroncosForums.com/forums

...but I didn't claim my "opine" is more credible than yours. If that's what you inferred from me offering to answer people's questions about the sport's defenses, then that sounds like your issue, not mine.

I think its the way you come across with it. I understand everything you are explaining based on my previous experience...but its almost as if though your explanations reek of an "im smarter and better than you" attitude.

Just my opinion.

The short answer for those that care to understand defenses in depth...buy a book. Pat Kirwan just released a good one

If you don't like don't read his thread. Pretty simple if you ask me.

Originally Posted by CoachChaz

I think its the way you come across with it. I understand everything you are explaining based on my previous experience...but its almost as if though your explanations reek of an "im smarter and better than you" attitude.

Just my opinion.

The short answer for those that care to understand defenses in depth...buy a book. Pat Kirwan just released a good one

Yes. Thank you. And i'll listen to you allll day, coach. ;')

"Take Your Eyes off the Ball". Definitely want to get that book.

Mobile Post via http://Mobile.BroncosForums.com/forums