Thread: Way to represent the AFC West...

Originally Posted by topscribe

All because you're trying to make something of the Smack forum here.

Few here know about the Smack wars you and I once had over on Mania. Now, those were something.

Ahh Broncomania. The old days when the mb was great and there were only Jake vs Jay wars, not this Tebowmania over the top stuff . Denver was much better and Shanny was here. I miss them immensely

NE was good too but those were great times.

Just ask WTE, worsttrollever, Little Old Lady, Hip Hop Pats Fan, Mr Roper and WTEs Pizzaman.

Lots of aliases,

Originally Posted by Medford Bronco

DS no smack here. I like McFadden and always have since college. He needs to stay healthy. That really killed Oak this year. Do you think he can be an every down back or should be more on a rotational basis so he does not get dinged like he does every season. Trust me he has torched Denver and other teams many times but on the sidelines he cant help anyone.

He should be an every down back. If he can't stay healthy, well that's one of the tough breaks in football. I like Michael Bush and all, but if McFadden was in the first Charger game, he has a TD run and a TD catch of 90+ yards. McFadden is too beast to take carries away from him.

Originally Posted by KCL

Such class in a smack thread!!! You rock Med...
DS does too.

Well I have to ask DS a question. He is not a turd like some here and want an answer. It is not like this MB is legisated where you have to post in the correct forum.

Some might get their panties in a bunch but most live with it.

Originally Posted by Devilspawn

He should be an every down back. If he can't stay healthy, well that's one of the tough breaks in football. I like Michael Bush and all, but if McFadden was in the first Charger game, he has a TD run and a TD catch of 90+ yards. McFadden is too beast to take carries away from him.

How about 75% 25% so you keep him fresh and use him most times. Like Turner and Tomlinson where at the end of LTs time in SD?

Originally Posted by Medford Bronco

Ahh Broncomania. The old days when the mb was great and there were only Jake vs Jay wars, not this Tebowmania over the top stuff . Denver was much better and Shanny was here. I miss them immensely

NE was good too but those were great times.

Just ask WTE, worsttrollever, Little Old Lady, Hip Hop Pats Fan, Mr Roper and WTEs Pizzaman.

Lots of aliases,

Wish Mr. Roper would come back during the baseball season, especially now that the Yanks are (once again) World Series favorites.

Originally Posted by Devilspawn

Wish Mr. Roper would come back during the baseball season, especially now that the Yanks are (once again) World Series favorites.

I like Kuroda as a Dodger fan. How is the kid they got from Seattle? I heared he has a great arm. Yanks are gonna be good.

My Dodgers well you know bankrupt...............

Sox picked up Padilla, He is so injury prone. Good arm but damn he gets hurt a lot.

To get on topic. The AFC west is sucky. Master of the obvious.

Maybe the elite fan can tell us how Oak will be 15-1 next year.

What is the Carson Palmer of 2004 coming back next season

Originally Posted by Medford Bronco

How about 75% 25% so you keep him fresh and use him most times. Like Turner and Tomlinson where at the end of LTs time in SD?

I could live with that yes. But I know they'll be that one play where the other guy gets caught from behind and then I'll see 500 "McFadden would've taken that to the house" threads on the Raiders forum. Then they'll question the other guy's ability to carry a football for positive yards. Some would want to trade him.

I did want the 75-25 this year and it worked this year and last year until McFadden went down.

Originally Posted by Devilspawn

Yeah man that SUCKS! You should round it off to an even decade. Then the Raiders would have a better playoff win percentage than the rest of the other 3 AFCW teams COMBINED! That's not a flex more than a pathetic post season stat for all representatives.

Anyway to the Pats fans, I say congrats and GO YANKEES!

If we go back 15 years...

AFCW Regular Season results 1997-2011)
Denver Broncos: 137-103 (9 winning seasons, 2 losing seasons & 4 .500 seasons - 3 division titles & 7 play-off appearances, )
San Diego Chargers: 119-121 (6 winning seasons, 5 losing seasons & 4 .500 - seasons - 5 division titles & 5 play-off appearances)
Kansas City Chiefs: 116-124 (6 winning seasons, 8 losing seasons & 1 .500 seasons - 3 division title & 4 play-off appearances)
Oakland Raiders: 98-142 (3 winning seasons, 8 losing seasons & 4 .500 seasons - 3 division titles & 3 play-off appearances, )

AFCW Play-offs results 1997-2011)
Denver Broncos: 9-5 record in the play-offs, 2-0 in SBs
Oakland Raiders: 4-3 record in the play-offs, 0-1 in SBs
San Diego Chargers: 2-5 record in the play-offs, 0-0 in SBs
Kansas City Chiefs: 0-4 record in the play-offs, 0-0 in SBs

So yes DS, when your Raiders have actually made it to the play-offs over the past 15 years, they have done much better than the Chargers & Chiefs

Originally Posted by FanInAZ

If we go back 15 years...

AFCW Regular Season results 1997-2011)
Denver Broncos: 137-103 (9 winning seasons, 2 losing seasons & 4 .500 seasons - 3 division titles & 7 play-off appearances, )
San Diego Chargers: 119-121 (6 winning seasons, 5 losing seasons & 4 .500 - seasons - 5 division titles & 5 play-off appearances)
Kansas City Chiefs: 116-124 (6 winning seasons, 8 losing seasons & 1 .500 seasons - 3 division title & 4 play-off appearances)
Oakland Raiders: 98-142 (3 winning seasons, 8 losing seasons & 4 .500 seasons - 3 division titles & 3 play-off appearances, )

AFCW Play-offs results 1997-2011)
Denver Broncos: 9-5 record in the play-offs, 2-0 in SBs
Oakland Raiders: 4-3 record in the play-offs, 0-1 in SBs
San Diego Chargers: 2-5 record in the play-offs, 0-0 in SBs
Kansas City Chiefs: 0-4 record in the play-offs, 0-0 in SBs

So yes DS, when your Raiders have actually made it to the play-offs over the past 15 years, they have done much better than the Chargers & Chiefs

lol those numbers are so irrelevant to now. Good work though for pulling them up, I commend you

Originally Posted by FanInAZ

If we go back 15 years...

AFCW Regular Season results 1997-2011)
Denver Broncos: 137-103 (9 winning seasons, 2 losing seasons & 4 .500 seasons - 3 division titles & 7 play-off appearances, )
San Diego Chargers: 119-121 (6 winning seasons, 5 losing seasons & 4 .500 - seasons - 5 division titles & 5 play-off appearances)
Kansas City Chiefs: 116-124 (6 winning seasons, 8 losing seasons & 1 .500 seasons - 3 division title & 4 play-off appearances)
Oakland Raiders: 98-142 (3 winning seasons, 8 losing seasons & 4 .500 seasons - 3 division titles & 3 play-off appearances, )

AFCW Play-offs results 1997-2011)
Denver Broncos: 9-5 record in the play-offs, 2-0 in SBs
Oakland Raiders: 4-3 record in the play-offs, 0-1 in SBs
San Diego Chargers: 2-5 record in the play-offs, 0-0 in SBs
Kansas City Chiefs: 0-4 record in the play-offs, 0-0 in SBs

So yes DS, when your Raiders have actually made it to the play-offs over the past 15 years, they have done much better than the Chargers & Chiefs

Oh so now it's 15 years, Doc? Why don't we do historically and end the debate once and for all.

Originally Posted by Medford Bronco

lol those numbers are so irrelevant to now. Good work though for pulling them up, I commend you

Him and Joel are full of info...

Originally Posted by Devilspawn

Oh so now it's 15 years, Doc? Why don't we do historically and end the debate once and for all.

He cant do that, then the Raiders would come out on top


you can bend any stat and make it look good. That is why stats lie.

Originally Posted by KCL

Him and Joel are full of info...

full of something. Not sure it is info

sorry Joel and Az. Just having fun a few days after our bludgeoning and having to go back to work in Boston and here how pathetic the Broncos are tomorrow, cant wait..

Poor Med...

Originally Posted by WTE:1525106

Originally Posted by Thnikkaman

I would, and make sure I splashed your face a few times.

Yuck! You don't eat a lot of asparagus, do you?

Yes. I love the stuff.