Thread: Travis will be here next year.

No chance at McFadden, unless he lost an arm.

Originally Posted by Dream

No chance at McFadden, unless he lost an arm.

Apparently you're not following the conversation. If we are 3-13 or 2-14 as Jr has suggested then yes we will more than likely have the opportunity to draft McFadden without him having to lose an arm.

Originally Posted by TXBRONC

Apparently you're not following the conversation. If we are 3-13 or 2-14 as Jr has suggested then yes we will more than likely have the opportunity to draft McFadden without him having to lose an arm.

Yeah, too bad we're not going to finish that badly.

Originally Posted by Dream

Yeah, too bad we're not going to finish that badly.

I don't think we will either.

Originally Posted by TXBRONC

I don't think we will either.

we shall see who is closer to the correct prognostication. I think we will be a lot closer to 3-13 than 9-7..or higher like you think.

Originally Posted by Jrwiz

we shall see who is closer to the correct prognostication. I think we will be a lot closer to 3-13 than 9-7..or higher like you think.

jr out of the next 10 games you thin we will only win 1? we got pits, greenbay,detroit, kansas city, tenn,chi,oak,kansas city,hou,san diego, minn.

gb,det,ten (if young is still hurt),chi, hou. all those teams are struggling to run the ball. I dont care how good the teams defense is, or their recievers or thier record. If they cant run on us. Then we should win.

We stopped the bills, and the raiders. All because we didnt let them run for 250+ if we can hold them to under 150 we can win.

I think we beat GB,DET,CHI,OAK,KC,HOU, AND MAYBE TEN.if young isnt playing.

there is no way we lose to all of those teams except one.

Originally Posted by underrated29

jr out of the next 10 games you thin we will only win 1? we got pits, greenbay,detroit, kansas city, tenn,chi,oak,kansas city,hou,san diego, minn.

gb,det,ten (if young is still hurt),chi, hou. all those teams are struggling to run the ball. I dont care how good the teams defense is, or their recievers or thier record. If they cant run on us. Then we should win.

We stopped the bills, and the raiders. All because we didnt let them run for 250+ if we can hold them to under 150 we can win.

I think we beat GB,DET,CHI,OAK,KC,HOU, AND MAYBE TEN.if young isnt playing.

there is no way we lose to all of those teams except one.

Look this team could go either way it could go into the toilet quick or come around , I see them as visiting the bathroom.

I do not see us beating GB or TEN period regardless of running game or not.

This Defense has made all pros of every RB that we have come across. We can not stop any RB and if we put 8-10 in the box the decent to good QB will pick us apart cause the DL does not put a lot of pressure on the QB.

OAK KC HOU and maybe even CHI and DET are loses waiting to be racked up .

Save the team money and humiliation by not even going to SAN KC or OAK. forfeit those games and create a few more bye weeks.

Not gonna guess @ MIN as that is to long from now, but that might be our only win yet this year.. With maybes in CHI and DET and if tater and foster get hot running the ball DET is no lock...

I have not seen anything yet that shows any reason to believe we can stop any warm body from running the ball. Until then I got to go with 1-forever the rest of the season.

Let me add I also see no reason to believe with the OLINE neat up like it is and the rest of the injuries on offense that scoring inside the red zone does not look like that is gonna change much either.

So that leaves out outscoring someone. if you can't outscore someone with a poor O and piss poor D.

I don't think we will but as bad as we have been playing, and depending on what happens with Javon all those teams mentioned may very well beat us.

Hell we barely beat Oakland while at full strength.

With Detroit, they are not a good team perhaps but Tatum doesn't need to run up the gut to beat us, he can run through the wide open gaps we have on our run D, and like him or hate him, if he gets an inch of free space he is gone.

Green bay with Favre always has a shot, Vikes has one of the best young backs in the league, Texans have a coach that knows our offense like the back of his hand, Chicago while not as good as last year are still basically the same team that went to the SB, KC is always a tough match, SD kicked our ass last time, and if we can't stop a guy we KNOW will run how are we to stop a QB that can run like a RB but will run when we don't always know he will?

I still think we will win some of them but if stuff doesn't improve drastically and soon, we could easily find ourselves losing most of those games.

The only games remaining that Denver has a 50/50 shot at winning are Detroit, Oakland, Houston. Every other game Denver has much less favorable odds on...and honestly I am not sure that they are 50/50 against Oak and Hou. I am just trying to make myself feel a little better.

I agree with JR...Denver is closer to 3-13 than 7-9. I will be extremely impressed if this team gets 4 more wins.

This just isn't their year.

Originally Posted by LDB

The only games remaining that Denver has a 50/50 shot at winning are Detroit, Oakland, Houston. Every other game Denver has much less favorable odds on...and honestly I am not sure that they are 50/50 against Oak and Hou. I am just trying to make myself feel a little better.

I agree with JR...Denver is closer to 3-13 than 7-9. I will be extremely impressed if this team gets 4 more wins.

This just isn't their year.

with all the injuries on top of all the changes and rookies no one in their right mind that thought this team was going to excell and certainly not be a super bowl contender. $ more wins this year would be a gift from heaven. I'm not even sure the DET with tater nad foster in a grudge match is winnable and HOU has Gary who at lest has a decent team in front of him as we speak.

I hope we do better but am not holding my breath....

Write this one off to all teh negatives and lets get some decent draft choices..

in light of the new news on walker i retract all my previous statements and am sure that we will land a top 5 pick.

it sucks but i am kinda looking foreward to it, in a giddy way.

Originally Posted by underrated29

in light of the new news on walker i retract all my previous statements and am sure that we will land a top 5 pick.

it sucks but i am kinda looking foreward to it, in a giddy way.

A top 5 pick would be nice, but it would also be expensive.

Denver, in my mind, has a lot of positions to address this offseason. I am beginning to think that it might be wiser (if they land a top 5 spot) to trade back and pick up multiple draft picks. I know people want a sexy new RB, but I'd rather get several solid (less expensive) players.

Originally Posted by LDB

A top 5 pick would be nice, but it would also be expensive.

Denver, in my mind, has a lot of positions to address this offseason. I am beginning to think that it might be wiser (if they land a top 5 spot) to trade back and pick up multiple draft picks. I know people want a sexy new RB, but I'd rather get several solid (less expensive) players.

exactly as i stated earlier, if we could trade to some team around like 11 or 12, we would get their pick, plus their 2nd and 1st next year. We could then take a good dt/lb and trade the 2nd or our 2nd for jenkins or whoever was on the block, then we still will have an early 2nd to use for dt/lb/or rb if we must.

I think that would be ideal.

Originally Posted by underrated29

exactly as i stated earlier, if we could trade to some team around like 11 or 12, we would get their pick, plus their 2nd and 1st next year. We could then take a good dt/lb and trade the 2nd or our 2nd for jenkins or whoever was on the block, then we still will have an early 2nd to use for dt/lb/or rb if we must.

I think that would be ideal.

It sounds good, but the only problem is the other team coming up with fair compensation.