Thread: What happened?

I don't necessarily expect it to work, I simply don't expect 4 interceptions. Maybe throw it away? 'Beach it' or whatever?

Originally Posted by Mr. Pro Bowl

My question however: Why do we expect Tim to pass the ball like 7 times in a row and expect for that to work, when all we did in the past games run the ball most of the time? I don't get it.

You're not alone. I don't think anyone knows the mind of Mike McCoy...

Originally Posted by HORSEPOWER 56

You're not alone. I don't think anyone knows the mind of Mike McCoy...

I mean the Bills sux, half of the stadium was empty - they all stayed home. We should have run them into the ground in our sleep!

It was just a classic azz kicking today

Not as bad as the Detroit game but BAD in a sense that Tebow already has games under his belt and played like he was at Mile High against the Lions.

I forgot to add that special teams also had about 3 blocks/holds that brought returns back and pinned the offense at the goal line. Including a 90 yd TD return by Eddie Royal.

Originally Posted by Mr. Pro Bowl

I mean the Bills sux, half of the stadium was empty - they all stayed home. We should have run them into the ground in our sleep!

Bills arent' as bad as they look. CJ Spiller is the difference IMO. He had been buried behind Jackson for most of the season but when Jackson got hurt he's been given the opportunity. He's really come into his own the last couple games.

With his 4.2 speed he's hard to stop.

Originally Posted by TimHippo

I forgot to add that special teams also had about 3 blocks/holds that brought returns back and pinned the offense at the goal line. Including a 90 yd TD return by Eddie Royal.

which, even Simms/Nance said was NOT a penalty. IMO, it was a terrible call. If that TD would have stood up, it might have turned things around.

Originally Posted by Denver Native (Carol)

which, even Simms/Nance said was NOT a penalty. IMO, it was a terrible call. If that TD would have stood up, it might have turned things around.

That was awful and also the McKlevin TD return where he stepped on the line but the officials ignored. Some really bad/biased officiating in the first half.

Originally Posted by Denver Native (Carol)

which, even Simms/Nance said was NOT a penalty. IMO, it was a terrible call. If that TD would have stood up, it might have turned things around.

Which is why i think Denver should keep Royal and use him in that manner. He is far better than Crosby.

Originally Posted by Northman

Which is why i think Denver should keep Royal and use him in that manner. He is far better than Crosby.

Crosby only runs a 4.5 40. Royal is 4.4 and has always been a good kick returner since VA Tech.

The huge distraction is what happened, when numerous Broncos were arrested for impersonating NFL football players.

Originally Posted by wayninja

You were at a xmas eve party at 11am that ended around 2pm? Are you overseas or something?

Our whole team played like dogshit with Tebow stinking it up the most. Back to back pick 6's is bad.

East coast so it was early afternoon, but it was early...Grandmas, babies, etc involved.

Originally Posted by TimHippo

That was awful and also the McKlevin TD return where he stepped on the line but the officials ignored. Some really bad/biased officiating in the first half.

This was flagged as illegal block in the back on Rosario (#81):









But on the McKelvin TD, this block on Woodyard (#52) wasn't called:








either call both, or call neither.

Originally Posted by pikkiwoki

This was flagged as illegal block in the back on Rosario (#81):

The call against Rosario was a bad call, but imo it didn't ultimately affect the outcome of the game. Denver just played a very bad game overall.

But on the McKelvin TD, this block on Woodyard (#52) wasn't called:

either call both, or call neither.

It's a judgement call, of course, but I agree with the official that this was not a block in the back and should not have been called.

Originally Posted by spikerman

The call against Rosario was a bad call, but imo it didn't ultimately affect the outcome of the game. Denver just played a very bad game overall.



It's a judgement call, of course, but I agree with the official that this was not a block in the back and should not have been called.

like i said, call both, or call neither.

i prefer call neither. broncos would've been up 14-10. who knows what happens from there? which is a rhetorical question. no one knows what happens from there. which is my point.

maybe with a lead the broncos play differently, on offense and defense. maybe the outcome doesn't change, maybe we still get blown out. or maybe not.

nobody knows. we'll never know. thanks, refs!