Should be a false start but the reversal on the TD catch was justified. The ball moved when it hit the ground therefore nullifying control.
Should be a false start but the reversal on the TD catch was justified. The ball moved when it hit the ground therefore nullifying control.
Nah, maybe someone will post it on youtube but the ball moved right when the nose of the ball hit the ground. If he had caught it and the ball never moved even hitting the ground than its a catch. But once it hit the ground and moved into his arms than thats why they said he lost control.
Dude, WVU put a whooping on Clemson with a record setting 70 points in a bowl game. lol
It's been an ass whoppin' to say the least.
It seemed like they spent the whole pregame pumping up Dabo Sweeney, the coach of Clemson and then to see the Tigers lay an absolute egg on national television. That's got to be humbling.
I guess WVU is now officially a Big XII school when they can run up that many points.
I miss the old Mile High Stadium.
Here it is, and I agree with North that the ball moved when the nose hit the ground. If it had been up to me I would have ruled it incomplete.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LG7Gt6C9rFM
“If there are no animals in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went.” - Will Rogers (paraphrased)
Yep. I mean, i could care less about ANY of these teams but i found it hard to believe that the commentator still said he would call it a TD even after seeing the replay. Clearly the ball moved and you cant call that a TD when that happens, its a pretty clear rule on that.
Go OHIO STATE!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)