Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: Kiper gives Broncos a "B" draft grade

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,374

    Default Kiper gives Broncos a "B" draft grade

    Denver Broncos
    Top needs: DL, CB, LB, S

    Summary: Denver got the player who could very well have the biggest impact of any rookie when it grabbed Miller with the No. 2 overall pick. I can see John Fox using him as a SAM linebacker, situationally creating matchup problems and allowing him to use his athleticism as a pass-rusher. Denver did need a safety, and Moore provides a lot of value all the way down at No. 45 overall. It was a weak safety class, but that's still quite low to get the first one off the board. Nate Irving could be a steal at No. 67, a player who recovered from a near-fatal accident and had some monster games. But I question where the defensive line help is coming from, and if the Broncos could pass on getting a corner. I had the D-line as a big need, and it wasn't addressed. Still, they added impact, and that counts.

    Needs: C+ Value B+

    And of course the Chargers outdrafted the Broncos according to Kiper.

    http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft...011DraftGrades
    Last edited by tomjonesrocks; 05-01-2011 at 09:19 AM.

  2. #2

    Default

    As much as he is a pompous ass, looks about on the mark. Everyone and I mean everyone knows how bad our Dl is.
    Putting a bandaid on a heart attack is not going to make it better.
    Got to fix the underlying issue. Bwe did not remotely do so.

  3. The Following 3 Users High Fived Lonestar For This Post:


  4. #3

    Default

    Its totally fair and even a little high. Ive seen a lot of B-s and C+s, which are also fair. They probably have more starters than they were shooting for but they also didnt address DT.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Adopted Bronco:
    Britton Colquitt
    Posts
    3,150

    Default

    I think that's fair and Kiper states that in his scale a B grade means a solid draft.

  6. The Following User High Fived I Eat Staples For This Post:


  7. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,374

    Default

    I also agree for the most part. In a draft deep at DT, for a team with the biggest need in the league at that position not to draft one is inexcusable IMO regardless of the given rationale. I don't hate the players that were drafted but the position this team needs to get over .500 still hasn't been addressed.

    The OT in the draft should have been a DT, IMO, period.

  8. The Following User High Fived tomjonesrocks For This Post:


  9. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Denver
    Adopted Bronco:
    Von Killer
    Posts
    3,170

    Default

    Kiper is an friggin idiot...Wasn't he the one who said Jamoron russell was the next coming...

    I always either change the channel to 212 or mute it when I see his fake hair and deformed face on TV...Just can't stand some of those jaggoffs. John Clayton too...Even though Clayton actually knows what he is talking about...I just can't look at him for more than a minute without the need to bludgeon myself with the remote.

  10. The Following User High Fived Benetto For This Post:


  11. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sharon, PA
    Adopted Bronco:
    Robert Ayers, Malik Jackson
    Posts
    9,798

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Benetto View Post
    Kiper is an friggin idiot...Wasn't he the one who said Jamoron russell was the next coming...

    I always either change the channel to 212 or mute it when I see his fake hair and deformed face on TV...Just can't stand some of those jaggoffs. John Clayton too...Even though Clayton actually knows what he is talking about...I just can't look at him for more than a minute without the need to bludgeon myself with the remote.
    excellent contribution

  12. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Denver
    Adopted Bronco:
    Von Killer
    Posts
    3,170

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmilinAssasSin27 View Post
    excellent contribution

    You're

  13. The Following 2 Users High Fived Benetto For This Post:


  14. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Kailua Hawaii
    Adopted Bronco:
    The Lombardi, Montee Ball
    Posts
    4,481

    Default

    Only way I dont like the Franklin pick is if he doesnt end up being a great starter.


    I wanted Austin initially all the way up to the draft, but then I saw some huge red flags on his character, in that he took absolutely no responsibility for his suspension, and threw everybody else under the bus. On gameday, he has no vision.

    And the knock on Paea is that his short arms are going to kill him at this level.

    We'll see, but I understand the Broncos not wanting to take the risk at that pick.

    Lastly, the draft was deepest at DE moreso than DT.

    Xanders said all the DTs with starting potential were gone in the first round. He ranked four of them.

    So Im glad we took someone who can start vs satisfying the fans need to see the "DT" slot filled with a name.

    We have an entire free agency to go through to fill the DT position, but I dont want to overpay for one either.

    Plug and play, I like that they were patient enough to not reach.
    Gnashing of TEETH

  15. The Following 3 Users High Fived WARHORSE For This Post:


  16. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Adopted Bronco:
    Chris Harris, Von Miller
    Posts
    6,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WARHORSE View Post
    Only way I dont like the Franklin pick is if he doesnt end up being a great starter.


    I wanted Austin initially all the way up to the draft, but then I saw some huge red flags on his character, in that he took absolutely no responsibility for his suspension, and threw everybody else under the bus. On gameday, he has no vision.

    And the knock on Paea is that his short arms are going to kill him at this level.

    We'll see, but I understand the Broncos not wanting to take the risk at that pick.

    Lastly, the draft was deepest at DE moreso than DT.

    Xanders said all the DTs with starting potential were gone in the first round. He ranked four of them.

    So Im glad we took someone who can start vs satisfying the fans need to see the "DT" slot filled with a name.

    We have an entire free agency to go through to fill the DT position, but I dont want to overpay for one either.

    Plug and play, I like that they were patient enough to not reach.
    It will hurt more if Austin and or Paea go on to be good with the Giants/Bears and Franklin doesn't pan out or just plays Guard for us. Guards are a dime a dozen and can easily be found later than the 2nd round - hence why I was surprised that Beadles wasn't the heir apparent for Harris and we were using him at Guard .

    Sure, if you find a blue chipper at Guard like Pouncey, make the pick, but it's not like Franklin was exactly blowing people's minds, either. I like the Franklin pick if he plays (and starts) at RT. Not so much for a Guard. A lot of decent Guards came off the board much later, NTM there are a good amount in FA this year that won't cost nearly what a FA DT does. Just throwing that out there.


    "It's not how big the wand is, it's how much magic is inside." - Head Coach John Fox

  17. The Following User High Fived HORSEPOWER 56 For This Post:


  18. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Adopted Bronco:
    Emma
    Posts
    33,828
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I still think Austin will bust bigtime.

  19. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,374

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HORSEPOWER 56 View Post
    It will hurt more if Austin and or Paea go on to be good with the Giants/Bears and Franklin doesn't pan out or just plays Guard for us. Guards are a dime a dozen and can easily be found later than the 2nd round - hence why I was surprised that Beadles wasn't the heir apparent for Harris and we were using him at Guard .

    Sure, if you find a blue chipper at Guard like Pouncey, make the pick, but it's not like Franklin was exactly blowing people's minds, either. I like the Franklin pick if he plays (and starts) at RT. Not so much for a Guard. A lot of decent Guards came off the board much later, NTM there are a good amount in FA this year that won't cost nearly what a FA DT does. Just throwing that out there.
    My thoughts exactly. The draft is a man's game--but they better have been right that none of those second-round-on DTs they had the ability to draft aren't players.

  20. #13

    Default

    I would give this draft a "D" personally. I think Kiper's being too optimistic.

    Here's what John Fox had to say:
    "We had a lot of holes, and you can't fill them all in just this draft," Fox said. "Never in any year that I've been in the National Football League have you accomplished filling all your needs in just one of those pools. I think we'll have to address that moving forward in that next pool."
    Sounds reasonable, right? This will convince any fan who doesn't really THINK about what it means.

    The statement confirms exactly what I thought. The Broncos first made a decision to get Miller with the #2 pick and thus missed out on all the "elite DTs."

    They apparently didn't like Austin & Paea much and other DTs they did like (we don't know who these were yet) were taken before they could pick.

    Thus, they failed to get one.

    Here's the problem with that philosophy:

    This is EXACTLY the reason the Broncos haven't drafted an elite DT since 1999! It's the same damn thing every single year! They're NEVER in the "proper position" to get one. It's always "too early" or "too late" to grab a DT in the first or second round and "the guy we wanted" was never there. "We didn't want to reach" for DT help.

    And thus, year after year after year, the Broncos are stuck trying desperately to find FA DTs who wind up sucking, while their defense flounders.


    Other teams face that same problem and yet manage to come up with good DTs. How? They DO "reach."

    Austin and Paea have questions about them. Austin missed the 2010 season due to suspension and Paea was injured. How good they will ultimately be is an open question.

    But, two teams with the credentials of having successfully built GOOD defenses for years, the Giants and Bears took chances on those guys.

    That's how it's done. Because there are so Few really good DTs in any draft you HAVE TO TAKE A CHANCE!

    That doesn't mean you reach wildly for the 15th DT in a poor class for DTs.

    But, it does mean you take advantage of your opportunities to grab a DT in one of the best DT classes in years!

    Why? When they have other pressing needs?

    Because you can always find a S or a LB in any draft. They are always going to be there. DT? NOT always.

    In fact, the Broncos haven't been in position to draft an elite DT without trading up for 10 years. Who thinks they will be in position to do it NEXT year?

    What happens NEXT year when they have the #14 pick and there are maybe TWO "elite DTs" and both are off the board in the top 10?

    Pass again on DT? Hope that somebody they like falls to the mid 2nd round? And what if he doesn't?

    Trade up to grab an elite DT in the top 10 and give up much of their draft to do it if that's even possible?

    They had this ONE chance when for the first time in 25 years they had a top 5 pick.

    I don't care how good Von Miller ends up being. This was a total FLOP of a draft because they blew that "once in a lifetime" chance to get an elite DT!

    (Of course it won't be a "once in a lifetime" chance if they keep picking in the top 10, but presumably they aren't counting on becoming the old Detroit Lions?)
    Last edited by Cugel; 05-01-2011 at 11:20 AM.

  21. The Following User High Fived Cugel For This Post:


  22. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    San Luis Obispo County, California
    Posts
    363

    Default

    I don't care how good Von Miller ends up being.

    Well, that's just a really poor thing to say coming from a Broncos fan. I know you're upset about the direction this draft turned out, but to say you don't care how our #1 pick plays because it wasn't the position you wanted?!?

    Clearly we need to find another DT in free agency. I'm totally excited about this draft because I think Fox and Dennis Allen have gotten together with Elway and Xanders and decided to have a fast, dynamic defense full of playmakers.

  23. The Following 2 Users High Fived Grover For This Post:


  24. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Colony, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    #58
    Posts
    17,796

    Default

    Some people will never be happy...no matter what. We could have drafted Dareus AND Fairley and there would be people complaining. Its life

  25. The Following 4 Users High Fived CoachChaz For This Post:


Go

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-27-2011, 10:30 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-25-2011, 03:40 PM
  3. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-10-2010, 11:07 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-09-2010, 03:10 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-10-2010, 09:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
status.broncosforums.com - BroncosForums status updates
dedicated servers
Partner with the USA Today Sports Media Group