Thread: _enver _efense found the D

Originally Posted by Traveler

Griese isn't a threat to hurt you with the run. Garrard killed us the last time because of his ability to run when needed. Their offensive line just destroyed us last time we played. They receivers are suspect so they will first try to pound it out.

Are we sturdy enough to negate their rushing attack?

Yes I agree 100%. I just did not state that here but I did in the "game plan the Jags" thread

Jags offensive line hasn't looked all that good from the little bit that I have seen from them. Garrard is not playing at the same level that did last year not is their defense. That being said Denver can't take them lightly.

Originally Posted by MissouriBronc

That offensive line is just so freakin' big...
Khalif Barnes, 6-5, 325
Uche Nwaneri, 6-2, 325
Dennis Norman, 6-5, 322
Milford Brown, 6-5, 330
Tony Pashos, 6-6, 325

Denver defensive line
Engelburger, 6-4, 260
Robertson, 6-1, 308
Thomas, 6-1, 305
Dumervil, 5-11, 260



I'm pretty sure Moss will be sitting this one out again...

Dallas has the same size OLine and we dealt well with them in practice and game time.

Originally Posted by GEM

Dallas has the same size OLine and we dealt well with them in practice and game time.

Agreed. If size was the be-all against the Jags big fat Sam Adams would have stopped a few running plays last year, and I don't remember that actually happening. We are in better shape than last year just by virtue of him being gone.

Size doesn't indicate skill. Example Superbowl 32. The largest defensive line in the league vs the smallest offensive line in the league. Result? 157 rushing yards and 3 rushing TDs

Originally Posted by LoyalSoldier

Size doesn't indicate skill. Example Superbowl 32. The largest defensive line in the league vs the smallest offensive line in the league. Result? 157 rushing yards and 3 rushing TDs

The Packers also had an offensive line that out weighed our defensive line if I'm not mistake.