Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: A perspective on the Spread Offense

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    SW Colorado
    Posts
    1,312

    Default A perspective on the Spread Offense

    Here's an interesting article about the spead offense. The author has some graphs to go along with it. Makes me think we may see more of the spread this year.

    During a recent sit-down with two NFL offensive line coaches, I was taken by surprise. What caught my attention is the apparent shift in philosophy when it comes to using the spread formation to protect the quarterback in passing situations.

    The coaches, one active and the other retired, surprisingly favored five-man protections over six or seven blockers under certain conditions.

    Years ago, both old-school coaches believed in getting everyone blocked, but now see the potential benefits of less protectors and the use of spread sets to neutralize the opposing pass rush. As one coach pointed out as a criticism of using six or seven men, "The more people I crowd in around the QB to get the blitz blocked up, the more people are capable of rushing the passer."

    First, let's explore how a spread formation with an empty set (no back in the backfield) or a formation with one running back, who has a free release, can protect the passer. Both strategies are known as "scat" protection, which means the offensive line will declare the five defenders they will block, leaving the quarterback responsible for the other rushers with a quick release and an accurate pass.

    While there's risk involved, the spread formation also moves the extra defenders away from pass rush lanes and makes it very difficult to get to the signal-caller in time.

    The rest of the article here.
    Avatar courtesy of Artist Faith Coyote

  2. The Following 4 Users High Fived Spiritguy For This Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Adopted Bronco:
    Ron Dayne
    Posts
    20,576

    Default

    Spread offense sucks balls.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    31,747

    Default

    Get used to it.
    Mobile Post via Mobile.BroncosForums.com/forums

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,349

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sneakers View Post
    Spread offense sucks balls.
    That's funny, because it's been pretty damn successful at every level from high school to the NFL, including Josh McDaniel's version that shattered statistical records on way to becoming the greatest offense in NFL history and an undefeated regular season.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    31,747

    Default

    But many still think that mikeys ZBS and modified WCO is going to save the day.

    Since we were the #2 O in 08 that was great.

    We don't need anything that actually wins games for us.
    Mobile Post via Mobile.BroncosForums.com/forums

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,349

    Default

    They might as well get over the ZBS. It had a great run but it's just not that effective anymore, especially in the redzone.

    The WCO is a very good system if run right, but Shanny had been slipping for years.

Go
Shop AFC Champions and Super Bowl gear at the official online Pro Shop of the Denver Broncos!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. A Little Perspective
    By Denver Native (Carol) in forum Broncos Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-14-2009, 03:02 PM
  2. West Coast Offense Vs. Spread Offense
    By NightTrainLayne in forum Football 101
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 04-07-2009, 01:30 AM
  3. spread offense vs .......
    By Spider in forum Broncos Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-21-2008, 02:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
status.broncosforums.com - BroncosForums status updates
Partner with the USA Today Sports Media Group