Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 4 12 13 14
Results 196 to 207 of 207

Thread: Proposal: Guidelines regarding posting pictures of dead bodies in sigs, avvy and posts

  1. #196
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Adopted Bronco:
    Glenn Martinez, Rahim Moore
    Posts
    27,114

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroncoJoe View Post
    I've often thought of running for office, but alas, might have too many "skeletons" in my closet I'm afraid.
    Did the skeletons have hands?

  2. The Following User High Fived BeefStew25 For This Post:


  3. #197
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    5,280
    Adopted Bronco:
    Case Keenum BITCHES!
    Posts
    34,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by beefstew25 View Post
    Did the skeletons have hands?
    I can neither confirm, nor deny such statement.

  4. #198
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,847

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroncoJoe View Post
    OK. Now answer me this: Said members (commie/che lovers) purposly have his (or another commie/murderer) as their avatar and/or signature, and the sole purpose is to piss off the AMERICAN's that post on this site.

    Is that OK?

    Again, Tned, I'm not trying to stir the pot, and am just looking for answers as to what is acceptable, and what is not. Behavior wise...
    It's a different debate. This one is about whether members should have to be subjected to corpses, and similar, images.

    It may be that we need to have an additional discussion about images that could be considered anti-American, or simply designed to upset the masses, but that is a dangerous line to draw in the sand, because once you start censoring unpopular images/sigs, where do you stop???

  5. The Following 2 Users High Fived Tned For This Post:


  6. #199
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    5,280
    Adopted Bronco:
    Case Keenum BITCHES!
    Posts
    34,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tned View Post
    It's a different debate. This one is about whether members should have to be subjected to corpses, and similar, images.

    It may be that we need to have an additional discussion about images that could be considered anti-American, or simply designed to upset the masses, but that is a dangerous line to draw in the sand, because once you start censoring unpopular images/sigs, where do you stop???
    I agree 100%. As previously stated, I'm not really into censorship, although some images are pretty offensive - to nearly everyone with eyes and vision.

    At some point, however, a line does need to be drawn. If you saw someone burning the American flag outiside your home, what would you do?

    I know what I would.

  7. #200
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,847

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroncoJoe View Post
    I agree 100%. As previously stated, I'm not really into censorship, although some images are pretty offensive - to nearly everyone with eyes and vision.

    At some point, however, a line does need to be drawn. If you saw someone burning the American flag outiside your home, what would you do?

    I know what I would.
    When I agreed to create and subsidize this forum, I made a commitment not to impose my will or opinions on the message board. So, what I would do doesn't matter as much as what the community as a whole (the best that can be determined) wants.

  8. The Following User High Fived Tned For This Post:


  9. #201
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    5,280
    Adopted Bronco:
    Case Keenum BITCHES!
    Posts
    34,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tned View Post
    When I agreed to create and subsidize this forum, I made a commitment not to impose my will or opinions on the message board. So, what I would do doesn't matter as much as what the community as a whole (the best that can be determined) wants.
    The exact reason I'd never start a forum. I admire you, Tned, but I could never run a forum that allows some of the clowns that post here. Football smack is one thing, dissing America is another.

    Again, that's why I could never run a forum. Don't get me wrong - I love the P&R section, but my allegiance to my country runs deep.

  10. The Following User High Fived BroncoJoe For This Post:


  11. #202
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,847

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroncoJoe View Post
    The exact reason I'd never start a forum. I admire you, Tned, but I could never run a forum that allows some of the clowns that post here. Football smack is one thing, dissing America is another.

    Again, that's why I could never run a forum. Don't get me wrong - I love the P&R section, but my allegiance to my country runs deep.
    Mine does too, and some of the sigs and opinions make me sick. However, I need the members of this message board to define how they want THEIR message board, their community, to be run, and I will enforce that.

  12. The Following 6 Users High Fived Tned For This Post:


  13. #203
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    31,784

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tned View Post
    Mine does too, and some of the sigs and opinions make me sick. However, I need the members of this message board to define how they want THEIR message board, their community, to be run, and I will enforce that.
    Which mean of course that if Joe wants to start a town hall discussion and get a vote going it is his prerogative.. It gets the ball rolling..

  14. The Following User High Fived Lonestar For This Post:


  15. #204

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroncoJoe View Post
    OK. Now answer me this: Said members (commie/che lovers) purposly have his (or another commie/murderer) as their avatar and/or signature, and the sole purpose is to piss off the AMERICAN's that post on this site.
    I don't have Guevara in my signature to "piss" off "gun-toting Republicans". I have Guevara in my signature because he is a fellow Socialist who shares in my ideals. I had Guevara in my signature long before people made him an issue on this board. Just as I had Lenin in my signature.

  16. #205
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Adopted Bronco:
    Wolfe
    Posts
    29,988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cleveland Rocks View Post
    I don't have Guevara in my signature to "piss" off "gun-toting Republicans". I have Guevara in my signature because he is a fellow Socialist who shares in my ideals. I had Guevara in my signature long before people made him an issue on this board. Just as I had Lenin in my signature.
    And I had Che Obama in my sig because I was supporting you.

  17. The Following 6 Users High Fived Davii For This Post:


  18. #206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Davii View Post
    And I had Che Obama in my sig because I was supporting you.
    Yea ..... riiiiiiiighttttt


  19. #207
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Adopted Bronco:
    Wolfe
    Posts
    29,988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cleveland Rocks View Post
    Yea ..... riiiiiiiighttttt

    Stealing my lines.

    Time for a new poll for rule considerations.

  20. The Following User High Fived Davii For This Post:

    KCL

Go
Shop AFC Champions and Super Bowl gear at the official online Pro Shop of the Denver Broncos!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. i need some help posting some pictures.....
    By underrated29 in forum What's on your Mind (Chit Chat)
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 02-01-2012, 03:20 PM
  2. Dead bodies in sigs and avatars
    By dogfish in forum Town Hall Discussion
    Replies: 105
    Last Post: 06-07-2008, 05:17 PM
  3. Dead Bodies
    By NameUsedBefore in forum Town Hall Discussion
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 05-26-2008, 11:42 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
status.broncosforums.com - BroncosForums status updates
Partner with the USA Today Sports Media Group