What team has had a more pathetic history?
The Lions or
The Cardinals
Lets Go Broncos
Who is more pathetic Lions or Cardinals
What team has had a more pathetic history?
The Lions or
The Cardinals
Kopite Moderator
Definitely the Cards, pathetic since '47
League
Championships 2 - 1925 (NFL), 1947 (NFL)
Conference
Championships None
Division
Championships 4 - 1947 (NFL West), 1948 (NFL West), 1974 (NFC East), 1975 (NFC East)
Playoff
Appearances 6 - 1947, 1948, 1974, 1975, 1982, 1998
Detroit:
NFL Champions (pre 1966): (4) 1935, 1952, 1953, 1957
Super Bowls Appearances: None
NFL Championship Games (Pre-1966): (5)1935, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1957
NFL/NFC Championship Games: (1) 1991
Division Champions: (8) 1935, 1952, 1953,1954, 1957, 1983, 1991, 1993
Playoff Appearences: (14) 1935, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1957, 1970, 1982, 1983, 1991, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1997, 1999
Besides, any team that had Barry Sanders to watch could never be regarded as completely pathetic
BFC.........D Will #27.............D Nash #29..............K Mc #11
You'll Never Walk Alone
The Whiskeyteers ~ One for all, and all for more
Rawr
sorry to stray off topic here, but med is there any news on our fantasy hockey??.. i cant view the old site anymore (this comp wont load it).. and i need to get my other friends who are in the info.. please let me know whats going on.
on topic- i say lions!
really they both are, but since larry fitz is one of my favs i got to go the other way.
BF OG
IMO, right now neither one of them are pathetic. Historically, they both are, but right now they're both on the verge of emerging.
"Milk is for babies. When you grow up, you have to drink beer" -Arnold
ALL-IN
Other.
Name team? Well, you know . . .
-----
Though He slay me, I will trust in Him . . . (Job 13:15)
Senior Member
Hint: It starts with an "R", ends with an "S", and has "AIDER" in the middle.
BF OG
I don't get it.Originally Posted by sneakers
Maybe you could....uhmmm...spell it out for me?
"Milk is for babies. When you grow up, you have to drink beer" -Arnold
Senior Member
Former Member
If you read it again, I think he means over the history of the league. The Raiders used to be a pretty prestigious franchise.
Go U Northwestern!
Lions. Everyone wants to talk about how much they've supposedly improved, but all they'll have to show for it is a losing record and another top-five pick. Viva Matt Millen!
Lets Go Broncos
could not agree with you more. They have sucked real bad since Barry Sanders retired.
but the Cards are pretty sad as well. It is like a 32nd place tie
Lets Go Broncos
Chiefs are not bad at all KCL. They acutually have made the playoffs and been a good team for a lot of years. I am talking history of the teams.The Chiefs
these two take the cake as being sad.
someone said the Raiders, the Raiders were once one of the best teams in the 70s 80s etc. Did have some success under Gruden not too long ago.
The Lions and Cards are so pathetic that neither has EVER played in a Super Bowl and the Cardinal have never since 1967 (the Super Bowl ERA) even played in their own Conference Championship game, while the lions were there once in 1991 and got wholloped by The Redskins
To compare the Broncos have been there 8 times since 1977, winning 6 of them.
Tebowner is subsiding...
Gotta go with the Detroit Lions. At least Arizona fans have had some things to look forward to, they have some young, talented recievers and a great situation at QB. The Lions, on the other hand...
Former Member
The Lions will win more games than the Cardinals this season...Book it!
Lets Go Broncos
they both suck. I would not go on Dets week 1 win over an equally pathetic Raider team that was a seive on defense this week.
Det has to play the AFC west this year. Good luck to them in the other 3 games, which I see as losses.
SD will kill them, we should beat them and KC will improve as the season goes on and should beat them as well IMO
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
