If the Bronco's go outside of the box, Stewart and Cromartie would be my choices.
If the Bronco's go outside of the box, Stewart and Cromartie would be my choices.
If Henry is still on our roster come draft day we will not draft a RB in Rd. 1. If we get rid of him we will be in the market for a starting RB because shanny has already said that young cannot take the load. I don't see us drafting a RB in the first Rd. There are just to many holes that we need to address at other positions. Henry will be on the roster for another year at least.
If we take J Stew, can we call him Beef Stew? Please pretty please?
Sorry. Im sticking to what I said.
I agree with Mayock on Mendenhall and Stewart. I just dont agree with his take on McFadden.
1. McFadden
2. Mendenhall
3. Stewart
4. Jones
Mayock pretty much said what I was talking tonight. What I called good feet, Mayock called good balance. He also said he has very good pad level which I have often pointed out. They also showed footage of him making cuts. Mayock said its hard to tell in the spread but pointed to a couple of plays he saw of Mendenhall where he read the play, planted his foot and was gone. Pretty much what Ive been telling you.
He basically said Stewart has one speed and takes too many big shots. I just recently pointed this out as well.
Last edited by lex; 02-12-2008 at 10:47 PM.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwSKFOfc04Q
I think Stewart helps the Broncos the most.... just look at how he did at Oregon. Oregon likes to spread the offense out... they don't rely on a FB. McFadden had a very good full back.
Denver has Cutler and two very good tightends. Shanny likes to spread the offense out for Cutler and he also likes to use two tightend formations as well as two wide outs. Stewart is a good receiver out of the back field and also has the size to protect the QB in pass protection plays. Stewart would excel in Denver's zone blocking scheme as well as give the Broncos a weapon they haven't had in a long time without having a good full back unlike T.D. had with Griffith.
I see nothing but special written all over Stewart. I know we have other needs, but we do have a lot of picks and we would be reaching by taking a DT or safety at 12. I doubt that Ellis and Dorsey slide back to 12, and trading back will be hard because there just isn't anyone in this draft that teams want to trade up to 12 for, unless it is Stewart or a QB that slides for some reason.
If we draft Stewart at 12, we will be set at QB, #1 WR, TE, and RB for a very long time. Throw that in with the fact our o-line is very young and talented and we are looking super strong on offense.
Defense will get better when some of the aging veterans move on and we can bring back some more speed and strength. It's not like we are trading up to get Stewart , so we still have a 2nd, 4th, 4th, 5th, 5th, 7th, and 7th to address the defense. Plus trade bait in Foxworth, Henry, Walker, and Gold to aquire more picks.
Stewart is also a kick returner, so we actually address two areas of need by selecting him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)