PDA

View Full Version : Rate which QB had the better season



CoachChaz
12-01-2009, 01:38 PM
# COMP...ATT...%...YARDS...TD's...INT...RUSHES...YAR DS...TD's

1...267....439....61....3217.....28.....6.......13 1........455........8

2...310....432....72....3328.....27.....9.......11 1........368........2

3...162....244....66....2166.....17.....4.......19 3........796........13

4...178....328....54....2464.....20.....17......47 .........111........3

5...167....270....62....1966.....15.....8.......10 3........296........4

6...220....344....64....2664.....16.....9.......84 .........127.........4

7...162....249....65....2048.....23.....3.......20 ..........29..........2

8...289....425....68....3722.....28.....4.......59 .........-95.........3

9...211....372....57....2552.....18....11......98. ........311.........5

10..309...514....60....3258.....23.....13.....39.. .......-101........0




Rank them in order...if you're bored and have time. Just trying to get a consensus on something I'm curious about

Northman
12-01-2009, 05:32 PM
Thats how i would rank them.


8...289....425....68....3722.....28.....4.......59 .........-95.........3

2...310....432....72....3328.....27.....9.......11 1........368........2

1...267....439....61....3217.....28.....6.......13 1........455........8

3...162....244....66....2166.....17.....4.......19 3........796........13

7...162....249....65....2048.....23.....3.......20 ..........29..........2

10..309...514....60....3258.....23.....13.....39.. .......-101........0

6...220....344....64....2664.....16.....9.......84 .........127.........4

5...167....270....62....1966.....15.....8.......10 3........296........4

9...211....372....57....2552.....18....11......98. ........311.........5

4...178....328....54....2464.....20.....17......47 .........111........3

Tned-Mobile
12-01-2009, 05:46 PM
Ok, here's a shot at it. Taken in a vacuum, I find it almost impossible to rank them. I think #'s 3 and 1 have an advantage of being a redzone thread with their feet, which should also mean teams have to spy them in and out of the redzone.

However, without knowing the type of running game and what the team makeup was around the QB's, I think it is very hard to rank them. #7, with a great 23:3 TD:INT ratio could be great, but with the very low attempts and yards, that would only be the case if the team had a dominant running game and passing game wasn't a major part of the offense. That's an example of why I think ranking blind is very difficult.

# COMP...ATT...%...YARDS...TD's...INT...RUSHES...YAR DS...TD's

1...267....439....61....3217.....28.....6.......13 1........455........8

3...162....244....66....2166.....17.....4.......19 3........796........13

7...162....249....65....2048.....23.....3.......20 ..........29..........2

2...310....432....72....3328.....27.....9.......11 1........368........2

8...289....425....68....3722.....28.....4.......59 .........-95.........3

9...211....372....57....2552.....18....11......98. ........311.........5

4...178....328....54....2464.....20.....17......47 .........111........3

5...167....270....62....1966.....15.....8.......10 3........296........4

6...220....344....64....2664.....16.....9.......84 .........127.........4




10..309...514....60....3258.....23.....13.....39.. .......-101........0

CoachChaz
12-02-2009, 09:02 AM
Looks like the trend is coming about. Between the 2 threads, most people seem to have a top 3 of #8, #2 and #1.

Tned
12-02-2009, 09:27 AM
Looks like the trend is coming about. Between the 2 threads, most people seem to have a top 3 of #8, #2 and #1.

Sucked in by the passing yards and TD passes. I tried to look (as much as possible with only a stat line) everything the QB appeared to be bringing to the table.

Northman
12-02-2009, 02:46 PM
Yea, i concentrated on completion percentage, yardage, and turnovers in my rankings.

LRtagger
12-09-2009, 11:24 AM
How about this?


. COMP...ATT...%...YARDS...TD's...INT...RUSHES...YAR DS...TD's
...468.....659...71....5449.....43.....9.......56 .........132.......4