FanInAZ
09-22-2009, 03:24 AM
My WRs have been horrible to this point.
Cribbs (Cle) did torch the Vike's special teams during week 1. He has not however done anything worth mentioning as a WR and was held in check by Denver's special teams.
Randle El (Was) has done just enough for me to not cut him all together and is now on my bench.
I've brought in 3 new receivers this week to address this problem.
1: Knox (Chi) is a rookie who is actually leading the Bears in receiving. Reports that I've been reading on line says that he will looked to more in the future.
2: Robinson (StL) has more yards then next 3 Rams receivers combined as well as their only TD.
3: Stokley (Den) is our #3 receiver at this time, but is actually our leading receiver as well. He has the only TD scored by one of our WRs. Unlike Knox and Robinson, no one seems to believe that this trend will hold.
Now for the question. Clearly Knox and Robinson are going into my 2 open WR slots, but what about Stokely? Should I start him a head of Cribbs or keep him on the bench?
Cribbs (Cle) did torch the Vike's special teams during week 1. He has not however done anything worth mentioning as a WR and was held in check by Denver's special teams.
Randle El (Was) has done just enough for me to not cut him all together and is now on my bench.
I've brought in 3 new receivers this week to address this problem.
1: Knox (Chi) is a rookie who is actually leading the Bears in receiving. Reports that I've been reading on line says that he will looked to more in the future.
2: Robinson (StL) has more yards then next 3 Rams receivers combined as well as their only TD.
3: Stokley (Den) is our #3 receiver at this time, but is actually our leading receiver as well. He has the only TD scored by one of our WRs. Unlike Knox and Robinson, no one seems to believe that this trend will hold.
Now for the question. Clearly Knox and Robinson are going into my 2 open WR slots, but what about Stokely? Should I start him a head of Cribbs or keep him on the bench?