PDA

View Full Version : Shanahan: Haynesworth trade possible ... if part of bonus is repaid



Denver Native (Carol)
06-16-2010, 03:54 PM
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d818af9a9&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true

ASHBURN, Va. -- Redskins coach Mike Shanahan implied Wednesday that if disgruntled defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth would return some -- or maybe all -- of the $21 million in bonus money he was paid April 1, then it's possible that Washington would try to trade or release him. Shanahan would not directly address what the team's plan of action would be with Haynesworth, but the coach suggested that the next move would be up to Haynesworth.

Shanahan's remarks came after a rain-shortened, mandatory minicamp workout that Haynesworth opted to skip because he wants to be traded. On Tuesday, Haynesworth's agent, Chad Speck told NFL Network insider Jason La Canfora that Haynesworth would skip the team's entire minicamp and had formally requested a trade.

Speck told the Washington Post, who was the first to report the story, that Haynesworth "has made it clear to me that he does not want to play for the Washington Redskins."

Haynesworth has been upset since Shanahan took over for Jim Zorn this offseason and changed the defensive scheme from a 4-3 front to a 3-4. Shanahan declined to address whether the team would fine Haynesworth, but it has the right to do so since the mini-camp is mandatory. He also sidestepped a question as to whether Haynesworth would even be welcomed at this point.

"We'll make some decisions here shortly," Shanahan said. "I am very disappointed because he did have the ability to go somewhere else, and we asked for nothing in return other than us not having to pay the remainder of his contract. He made $12 million his first year, and we felt that if he didn't want to be a part of us, that's fine. If you wanted to go someplace else that would be better for you and you want to play in a 4-3 scheme, then don't take our check and then say you don't want to be part of our organization."

Shanahan said that after a February meeting with Haynesworth that the defensive tackle and his agent were given permission to find a job with other teams. Shanahan said that if Haynesworth found one the Redskins would let him walk as a free agent. However, if Haynesworth took the $21 million bonus money, he was expected to be with the Redskins, wholeheartedly. Haynesworth has skipped nearly all voluntary and, now, mandatory programs.

Shanahan made it clear repeatedly that Haynesworth was more about money than pursuing football options.

"Obviously, he took the check, so I was surprised that he wasn't here today," Shanahan said. "I thought he did make the commitment once he took the check that he wanted to be a Washington Redskin. Obviously, it didn't go in that direction. I'm quite disappointed."

Haynesworth signed a seven-year, $100 million free-agent contract with Washington in 2009 with guarantees of $42 million. He only played in 12 games, and his performance was viewed as disappointing. Frequently injured, his fitness and attitude were subject to doubt. Haynesworth finished with only four sacks and questioned the team's leadership as the Redskins spiraled in a 4-12 season under coach Jim Zorn.

New leadership has come, but it's not to Haynesworth's taste. He rankled Shanahan by staying away from the team's voluntary offseason conditioning program, saying he felt the need to work with his trainer to regain the power and strength he had in previous seasons.

But the team and player have a bigger split over the switch to a 3-4. Haynesworth stood out as the only player to boycott the first two minicamps -- both voluntary -- while hoping the Redskins would trade him. Shanahan firmly said at the time that trade wasn't going to happen.

Haynesworth still wants a trade, preferably before training camp begins late next month. He made it clear in his statement that the current Redskins defensive scheme is not what he signed up for, even though he had to know that changes in defense would be likely during the course of a seven-year contract.

"When I signed here after meeting all day with the staff and top executives, and talked about the defense that we would run and what my role would be, I was assured I would have the freedom to play to my strengths and I was excited about the future," Haynesworth said Tuesday in a statement to Comcast SportNet. "After many years in the NFL, I know what it takes for me to perform at my highest level. My number one goal has always been to help my team win -- period.

"It's also important at my position to help free my teammates to make plays, which I've done throughout my career when I've been allowed to play to my strengths. I will continue to work individually to prepare for training camp and the start of the 2010 season."

Denver Native (Carol)
06-16-2010, 04:06 PM
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d818af50a&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true

ASHBURN, Va. -- On the day he signed his $100 million contract, Albert Haynesworth famously said: "You're not going to remember Albert Haynesworth as a bust."

On Wednesday, the Washington Redskins used a more scathing word to describe the two-time All-Pro defensive tackle: selfish.

Haynesworth was a no-show at the Redskins mandatory minicamp Wednesday because he doesn't like the team's new defense and wants to be traded, escalating a months long showdown with coach Mike Shanahan. Players responded with some of the harshest comments that can be directed at a teammate.

"Albert made a very selfish decision," said linebacker London Fletcher, the team's most respected veteran. "When you decide to play a team sport, you have to look at it and think about everybody involved in the situation. This is not golf, tennis, things like that, where it's an all-about-you sport. What he's decided to do is make a decision based on all-about-him."

Fletcher and others went further, painting a portrait of a player who has been self-centered since the day he joined the Redskins.

"It's no different than his attitude and approach to last year's defense," Fletcher said, "about wanting everything to revolve around him and him making plays. And if it didn't benefit him, he wasn't really willing to do it."

The Redskins can fine Haynesworth up to $9,442 for missing the minicamp practice, hardly a dent in the money he's collected from the team for one season's worth of work. He been paid $32 million of the $41 million guaranteed in the seven-year, $100 million contract he signed as a free agent last year.

Ironically, Haynesworth missed a practice that lasted all of 15 minutes, with the players stretching and running 10 100-yard dashes before a thunderstorm cut the session short. The two-day minicamp wraps up Thursday.

Shanahan did not say what the Redskins will do next. They could release Haynesworth, try to trade him, look through the nooks and crannies of contract legalese to see if there's a way to get some of the bonus money back, or keep him on the roster and force another showdown when training camp opens July 29.

Having pocketed his money, Haynesworth simply wants out of Washington. He is unhappy that the Redskins are switching to a 3-4 defense and prefers a scheme that would allow him the type of freedom he had during his seven seasons with the Tennessee Titans. Hoping for a trade, he did not participate in the team's offseason conditioning program and skipped two voluntary minicamps.

Haynesworth's agent, Chad Speck, did not immediately respond to requests for comment Wednesday.

But Haynesworth's teammates were talking. And they made it clear that if he shows up for training camp, there will be fences to mend.

Said defensive end Phillip Daniels: "I think I speak for every guy on this team: We all feel like he turned his back on us."

Added center Casey Rabach: "It's getting to be selfish. He's hurting the team. It doesn't sit well with the players. ... You can't really count on him right now."

Said Fletcher: "There's ways he cannot be a Redskin: Give the money back. We'll move on without him. I want teammates who I can depend on, who I can count on, who in the fourth quarter I know is going to be there to make a play or do his job that the defense calls (for). We need people that we can depend on. And at the end of the day, right now, he's showing that he can't be depended upon. ... Last year we had a lot of selfishness that took place, and we got 4-12 out of that. This year, we can't have that."

Cornerback DeAngelo Hall, who spoke with Haynesworth for about an hour on the phone Tuesday night, was one of the few willing to publicly empathize with the disgruntled player, saying that "promises were made" about the way Haynesworth would be used when the contract was signed.

Still, even Hall conceded that Haynesworth is all about Haynesworth.

"We know Albert's going to do what he wants to do," Hall said, "whether it's going to benefit him, benefit the team, or if it's a stupid idea or a good idea, he's going to do what he's going to do. It's kind of hard to change his mind."

FanInAZ
06-16-2010, 04:42 PM
He doesn't like the 3-4. We use the the 3-4. Next!

Day1BroncoFan
06-16-2010, 04:49 PM
I hope he never comes to the Broncos. :nod:

camdisco24
06-16-2010, 05:04 PM
I hope he never comes to the Broncos. :nod:

X2!

Northman
06-16-2010, 05:06 PM
Yea, good luck with that Shanny. You can thank Snyder for being a moron. lol

Broncolingus
06-16-2010, 06:26 PM
Man...this has gotten really nasty...

What a ******* scumbag (Haynesworth)...what's his issue anyway?

I've read a ton on this and have yet to come across any legitimate issue for him to be griping - much less talking shit and holding out.

T.K.O.
06-16-2010, 08:30 PM
this is exactly why we dont have a new cba......when players can pull this crap with a 100 million dollar deal and the NFLPA says the players are'nt getting their fair share?
BULLPOOP !....yeah i used the POOP word i'm so disgusted by this:mad::laugh:

scott.475
06-16-2010, 08:48 PM
Remember the "Why we must win Haynesworth" thread?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

GEM
06-16-2010, 10:20 PM
He doesn't like the 3-4. We use the the 3-4. Next!

I don't want that piece of shit on my team. His incident of stepping on a players face with cleats on purpose did it for me. Add this stuff and I'd be just as happy seeing him blackballed from the game.

camdisco24
06-17-2010, 12:28 AM
At this point I see a guy who is in line to be paid $100 Million big ones... If I were in that position I'd be working my tail off every single day, hands down, without second thought. What kind of person can honestly find something to complain about when he's in such a fortunate position??

UGH SO DISGUSTING.
Dirt>Haynesworth

sneakers
06-17-2010, 02:05 AM
What an idiot!

BroncoBJ
06-17-2010, 05:25 AM
Who would want him on the Broncos? :lol: And most importantly... why are people getting mad saying they won't want him on our team. As if McDaniels is considering getting him. :lol:

broncofaninfla
06-17-2010, 08:34 AM
The Skins should sue him for fraud. What a complete and total piece of shit.

T.K.O.
06-17-2010, 10:22 AM
took a check for 21 mil.....then said i dont wanna play for you !
i think the nflpa should be all over his ass for this.
he is making the players look like fools when they are in a heated battle to put the squeez on the league for more money.
it would be like a guy standing around all day with a shovel (doing nothing) while telling his boss he deserves a raise:laugh:

Dirk
06-17-2010, 10:43 AM
If only I could get a 100 million dollar contract. Some people just don't know how good they have it. :tsk:

broncogirl7
06-17-2010, 10:45 AM
Haynesworth is reminding me of the crybaby Rivers.
If anyone ever thought of him being a Bronco they should be brought out to the wood shed and beaten within an inch of his/her life.
Haynesworth is a doosh...he should be so lucky as to play for Shanahan!

Poet
06-17-2010, 02:39 PM
Man, he sure would look good in Cincinnati. That guy is one of the best players in the NFL, defense be damned. I wouldn't want that price tag because he's an idiot, but he's such a beast.

dogfish
06-17-2010, 05:11 PM
what an utter piece of garbage this guy is. . . .

silkamilkamonico
06-19-2010, 12:46 PM
I think him stepping on the skull of a gu ywith no helmet did it for me.

I still think it's a grave mistake for Shanahan to have messed with that defense. Washington innitially looked like a great place for him. Now, not so much, IMHO.

TXBRONC
06-19-2010, 01:24 PM
He doesn't like the 3-4. We use the the 3-4. Next!

Last year before Haynesworth signed with Redskins I said he wouldn't like playing in a 3-4 because then he wouldn't like because then he wouldn't be as many plays. Even then people wanted us sign him.

GEM
06-19-2010, 02:50 PM
Haynesworth is reminding me of the crybaby Rivers.
If anyone ever thought of him being a Bronco they should be brought out to the wood shed and beaten within an inch of his/her life.
Haynesworth is a doosh...he should be so lucky as to play for Shanahan!

I hate Rivers with all my being, but he doesn't come close to this douchebag! This guy stomps on a guys face with cleats, puts all his weight on, he bitches his way out of TN and into a huge contract to which he lies to the new team that he'll play their position if they'll give him his bonus, immediately coming out that he won't play in the new defense.

Rivers is passionate and he comes off as an *******, but I'd welcome him on my team any day of the week, twice on Tuesdays.

Haynesworth is simply a douchebag who I'd find a way to pay a few mil to never come to my team.

BroncoWave
06-19-2010, 02:58 PM
I hate Rivers with all my being, but he doesn't come close to this douchebag! This guy stomps on a guys face with cleats, puts all his weight on, he bitches his way out of TN and into a huge contract to which he lies to the new team that he'll play their position if they'll give him his bonus, immediately coming out that he won't play in the new defense.

Rivers is passionate and he comes off as an *******, but I'd welcome him on my team any day of the week, twice on Tuesdays.

Haynesworth is simply a douchebag who I'd find a way to pay a few mil to never come to my team.

Agreed, Rivers is a top 5 QB, I'd have him as a Bronco in a second.