Hey Guys How About Darrell Jackson??

[BRONCOSFREAK765]

darrell jackson was released after 49ers signed johnson. good fit for a west coast offense.

[ikillz0mbies]

Oh I saw this thread was coming! I mentioned his release in the other thread.

[Lonestar]

For vet minimum, if he gets past the FBI background check for no illegitimate kids and does not beat his wife/girlfriend. And does not go to Obamas church..

[vtroper]

How about Feline AIDS?

Just because something is avaliable doesn't mean it's something I want.

[BOSSHOGG30]

no way

[Scarface]

Only if he agrees to pay us and never steps on the field.



Then I might think about it.

[underrated29]

I odnt see the big problem with him, i think its was sfo crappy team that makes guys like him and vernon davis suck. I dont want us to get him, but if we do i could care less. well maybe about excited as i was when we signed kolbert

[UnderArmour]

Who wants Darrell Jackson when you can have Freddy Mitchell?

[nevcraw]

2007 Scouting Report - Scouts Inc.
Grade: 71 | Key
Alert: D

Comment: Jackson is crafty, experienced and pretty athletic. He can be productive on all three levels of the passing game. He has good short-area quickness and elusiveness in his releases off the line. He plays fast and can quickly close cushions against cornerbacks in off coverage. He is an excellent route runner. He is quick out of his routes, has a good setup and plays with balance and control. He gets his head and hands around quickly on outside speed cuts. He has solid hands and can adjust to catch outside his frame. He can move through traffic, go over the middle and catch in a crowd. He is elusive after the catch and has a nice stiff-arm. But Jackson lacks prototype No. 1 receiver skills. He isn't very big, fast or strong. He has a history of drops. He isn't a consistent or physical blocker, and he takes some plays off on the back side. He has missed significant playing and practice time the last two years, so durability is a major concern.

[Lonestar]

2007 Scouting Report - Scouts Inc.
Grade: 71 | Key
Alert: D

Comment: Jackson is crafty, experienced and pretty athletic. He can be productive on all three levels of the passing game. He has good short-area quickness and elusiveness in his releases off the line. He plays fast and can quickly close cushions against cornerbacks in off coverage. He is an excellent route runner. He is quick out of his routes, has a good setup and plays with balance and control. He gets his head and hands around quickly on outside speed cuts. He has solid hands and can adjust to catch outside his frame. He can move through traffic, go over the middle and catch in a crowd. He is elusive after the catch and has a nice stiff-arm. But Jackson lacks prototype No. 1 receiver skills. He isn't very big, fast or strong. He has a history of drops. He isn't a consistent or physical blocker, and he takes some plays off on the back side. He has missed significant playing and practice time the last two years, so durability is a major concern.



Well that should be a thread closer..

[MOtorboat]

A shorter, slower, more drop prone Ashley Lelie...:rockon:

Championship!:first:

[BANJOPICKER1]

Sounds to me like a good camp WR..I say get him..:D

[dogfish]

hmmm. . . .


darrell jackson: 487 receptions for 6,942 yards (average 14.3) and 50 touchdowns


keary colbert: 109 receptions for 1,424 yards (average 13.1) and 7 touchdowns



no, don't remind me-- colbert is a "great" signing, since we got him on the cheap because no one else wanted him. . . .

[TXBRONC]

I wouldn't mind if Denver brought him in. He's played in West Coast style offense his entire career so I don't think it would be to hard for him to adapt.

[lex]

hmmm. . . .


darrell jackson: 487 receptions for 6,942 yards (average 14.3) and 50 touchdowns


keary colbert: 109 receptions for 1,424 yards (average 13.1) and 7 touchdowns



no, don't remind me-- colbert is a "great" signing, since we got him on the cheap because no one else wanted him. . . .

No kidding. But Im not really impressed by either and I certainly wouldnt want both.


I wouldn't mind if Denver brought him in. He's played in West Coast style offense his entire career so I don't think it would be to hard for him to adapt.

How well has he played though?

[slim]

Wow...dog said it best DJ is head and shoulders above Coblert. Not sure why all the hate for DJ.

[TXBRONC]

No kidding. But Im not really impressed by either and I certainly wouldnt want both.



How well has he played though?

I don't know how well he's played the past couple of seasons.

[BRONCOSFREAK765]

Season Team Receiving Rushing Fumbles
G GS Rec Yds Avg Long TD Att Yds Avg Lng TD FUM Lost
2007 San Francisco 49ers 15 15 46 497 10.8 34 3 -- -- -- -- -- 1 0
2006 Seattle Seahawks 13 13 63 956 15.2 72T 10 -- -- -- -- -- 1 0
2005 Seattle Seahawks 6 6 38 482 12.7 48 3 1 7 7.0 7 0 -- --
2004 Seattle Seahawks 16 16 87 1,199 13.8 56T 7 -- -- -- -- -- 2 1
2003 Seattle Seahawks 16 16 68 1,137 16.7 80T 9 -- -- -- -- -- 1 1
2002 Seattle Seahawks 13 13 62 877 14.1 48 4 3 3 1.0 4 0 3 2
2001 Seattle Seahawks 16 16 70 1,081 15.4 64 8 1 9 9.0 9 0 -- --
2000 Seattle Seahawks 16 9 53 713 13.5 71 6 1 -1 -1.0 -1 0 2 2
TOTAL 487 6,942 14.3 80 50 6 18 3.0 9 0 10 6

[ydave77]

Per PFT....
"HACKETT LANDS IN CAROLINA
Posted by Mike Florio on March 17, 2008, 12:19 p.m.

The Carolina Panthers continue to load up on pass catchers who might benefit from all the attention that Steve Smith receives.

After bringing back Muhsin Muhammad, the team has now added D.J. Hackett, formerly of the Seattle Seahawks.

Per Adam Schefter of NFL Network and Adam Caplan of Scout.com, Hackett will sign a two-year, $3.5 million deal with the Panthers.

Hackett has shown flashes of ability during his NFL career, but that potential wasn’t enough to get a team to open its wallet wider than $1.75 million per year.

Other teams interested in Hackett were the Seahawks, the Redskins, and the Buccaneers.

The Panthers also have Dwayne Jarrett, a second-round pick in 2007, and Travis Taylor, a well-traveled first-round pick of the Ravens in 2000."

Ugly. I cant believe we paid more for Colbert, than Hackett got paid. That is a steal for Carolina. At first Ithought Colbert wasnt a horrible pickup, based on the assumption that Hackett and Bryant woudl go for big money, but this just makes me wonder if we are doing our due diligence. I mean did we ever even call Hackett's agent, see what type of humbers they were talking about? How about Bryant Johnson, the market for him was evidently pretty bare. He only ended up signing a 1 yr deal bc no one the offers he had must have been substandard. Even the terms werent released, which usually happens when the agent feels like he got a bad deal. So I wonder idd we even bother contacting Johnson or Hackett?

[shank]

2 year 3.5 million for hackett.

why the hell wouldn't we want him back in CO?

i don't like it, either we think colbert can be our #2 or we are going WR early in the draft. either way, i'd rather go another direction. hackett would have helped us.

[mclark]

2 year 3.5 million for hackett.

why the hell wouldn't we want him back in CO?

i don't like it, either we think colbert can be our #2 or we are going WR early in the draft. either way, i'd rather go another direction. hackett would have helped us.

I think we're thinking Colbert can be our #2.